THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHALSINH SHIVSINH VAGHELA Advocate - A R MATHUR — 414/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F),65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004642026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
414/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
414/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
118
Police Station
DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHALSINH SHIVSINH VAGHELA Advocate - A R MATHUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Bhalsinhji Shivsinh Vagheila) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, due to insufficient and unreliable prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution witnesses (panchas/neutral observers) contradicted their statements and the police officer's testimony, while the seized contraband (unauthorized liquor worth ₹2,900) lacked proper chain of custody documentation, making the case against the accused fail to meet the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused (Bhalsinhji Shivsinh Vagheila) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, due to insufficient and unreliable prosecution evidence. The court found that the prosecution witnesses (panchas/neutral observers) contradicted their statements and the police officer's testimony, while the seized contraband (unauthorized liquor worth ₹2,900) lacked proper chain of custody documentation, making the case against the accused fail to meet the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts