THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAGJIBHAI LAXMANBHAI JABADIYA — 413/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004632026

Filing Number

413/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

413/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

166

Police Station

DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAGJIBHAI LAXMANBHAI JABADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Nagjibhai Laxmanbhai Zakhdiya of charges under IPC Section 56(1)b, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court considered the accused's plea of guilty, poor economic circumstances, first-time offender status, family dependence, and remorse, while applying established sentencing principles to determine that conviction was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 413/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Nagjibhai Laxmanbhai Zakhdiya of charges under IPC Section 56(1)b, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court considered the accused's plea of guilty, poor economic circumstances, first-time offender status, family dependence, and remorse, while applying established sentencing principles to determine that conviction was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case