THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRATAPBHAI SHANTIBHAI PARMAR — 409/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004592026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
409/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
409/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
170
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRATAPBHAI SHANTIBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted Pratapbhai Shantibhai Parmar under IPC Section 54(1)B (Prohibition Act offense) for possessing and consuming illicit liquor. Considering the accused's first-time offense, poverty, family dependence, and remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine instead of imprisonment, with one day simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted Pratapbhai Shantibhai Parmar under IPC Section 54(1)B (Prohibition Act offense) for possessing and consuming illicit liquor. Considering the accused's first-time offense, poverty, family dependence, and remorse, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine instead of imprisonment, with one day simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts