THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KIRANKUMAR RAMJIBHAI PATNI — 407/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004572026

Filing Number

407/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

407/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

180

Police Station

DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRANKUMAR RAMJIBHAI PATNI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (for a crime of negligence) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid. The court found that the accused had voluntarily admitted to committing the offense, and considering the severity of the crime and the accused's circumstances as a poor person with dependents, the court imposed a lenient sentence while ordering confiscation of seized property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 407/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 285 (for a crime of negligence) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid. The court found that the accused had voluntarily admitted to committing the offense, and considering the severity of the crime and the accused's circumstances as a poor person with dependents, the court imposed a lenient sentence while ordering confiscation of seized property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case