THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HIMMATSINH MALSINH RAJPUT — 406/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004562026

Filing Number

406/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

406/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

161

Police Station

DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIMMATSINH MALSINH RAJPUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Dantiwada District Court convicted accused Himmatsinh Malsinh Rajput under IPC Sections 275, 1854, 181, and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Section 275 for a minor offense, sentencing him to pay a fine of ₹1,100 (or five days simple imprisonment in default). The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's voluntary confession, his status as a poor family man with children, and that this was his first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 406/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Dantiwada District Court convicted accused Himmatsinh Malsinh Rajput under IPC Sections 275, 1854, 181, and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Section 275 for a minor offense, sentencing him to pay a fine of ₹1,100 (or five days simple imprisonment in default). The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's voluntary confession, his status as a poor family man with children, and that this was his first offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case