THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AMITKUMAR VINODKUMAR SADHU — 400/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004492026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
400/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
400/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
167
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AMITKUMAR VINODKUMAR SADHU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted Amitkumar Vinodkumar Shahu under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) Section 8(1)(b) and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered his confession, first-time offense, poor financial condition, and family circumstances as mitigating factors while imposing the lenient sentence to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted Amitkumar Vinodkumar Shahu under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) Section 8(1)(b) and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered his confession, first-time offense, poor financial condition, and family circumstances as mitigating factors while imposing the lenient sentence to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts