THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AMITKUMAR VINODKUMAR SADHU — 400/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004492026

Filing Number

400/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

400/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

167

Police Station

PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMITKUMAR VINODKUMAR SADHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court convicted Amitkumar Vinodkumar Shahu under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) Section 8(1)(b) and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered his confession, first-time offense, poor financial condition, and family circumstances as mitigating factors while imposing the lenient sentence to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 400/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Amitkumar Vinodkumar Shahu under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) Section 8(1)(b) and sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200, with one day simple imprisonment as alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered his confession, first-time offense, poor financial condition, and family circumstances as mitigating factors while imposing the lenient sentence to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case