Government of Gujarat vs JENTIBHAI RAMABHAI DAMOR Advocate - J P RANA — 662/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 465,467,468,471,114,. Status: PROCESS TO ACCUSED. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK120007602018
Next Hearing
20th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
662/2018
Filing Date
28-11-2018
Registration No
662/2018
Registration Date
28-11-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, AMIRGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
AMIRGADH POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JENTIBHAI RAMABHAI DAMOR Advocate - J P RANA
RAKESHBHAI HARFULBHAI MINA
RAMESHCHANDRA AMARATLAL JOSHI(Name quashed from charge-sheet/complaint)
Adv. J.R.JOSHI
ANDABHAI RAJABHAI DAMOR(Absconding)
SANKALABHAI KALABHAI BHAGORA(Absconding)
MALIBEN MALABHAI DUNGAICHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 06-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The discharge application filed by accused no. 3 (notary Rameshchandra Amratlal Joshi) has been granted and the accused is discharged from all charges. The court found that Section 13 of the Notary Act, 1952 was violated—cognizance against a notary for acts committed in his professional capacity can only be taken upon a written complaint from an authorized government officer, not via a police report/chargesheet as occurred here. Since the legal bar to cognizance cannot be overcome, no charge can be framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The discharge application filed by accused no. 3 (notary Rameshchandra Amratlal Joshi) has been granted and the accused is discharged from all charges. The court found that Section 13 of the Notary Act, 1952 was violated—cognizance against a notary for acts committed in his professional capacity can only be taken upon a written complaint from an authorized government officer, not via a police report/chargesheet as occurred here. Since the legal bar to cognizance cannot be overcome, no charge can be framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts