Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHAI MUNGLABHAI BHAGORA Advocate - J R JOSHI — 87/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK120000912021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
87/2021
Filing Date
20-01-2021
Registration No
87/2021
Registration Date
20-01-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, AMIRGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195003200775
Police Station
AMIRGADH POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SURESHBHAI MUNGLABHAI BHAGORA Advocate - J R JOSHI
SAYBABHAI HIRABHAI DUNGAICHA
LALABHAI JALABHAI BHAGORA
Adv. J.R.JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted three defendants (Sureshbhai Muglabhail Bhagora, Sayabhail Hirabhail Dugaicha, and Lalabhail Jalabhail Bhagora) of charges under IPC Sections 379 and 114 for theft of five motorcycles worth ₹1,20,000. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant and witnesses provided no corroborating evidence linking the accused to the crime, and even the complainant himself could not establish the facts adequately. The accused were acquitted due to insufficient evidence and benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted three defendants (Sureshbhai Muglabhail Bhagora, Sayabhail Hirabhail Dugaicha, and Lalabhail Jalabhail Bhagora) of charges under IPC Sections 379 and 114 for theft of five motorcycles worth ₹1,20,000. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant and witnesses provided no corroborating evidence linking the accused to the crime, and even the complainant himself could not establish the facts adequately. The accused were acquitted due to insufficient evidence and benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts