Government of Gujarat vs RAMPRAKASH URFE PAPPUBHAI DOJIRAM RAJPUT — 200/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK100002352026
Filing Number
200/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
200/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DANTA
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195002220210
Police Station
AMBAJI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMPRAKASH URFE PAPPUBHAI DOJIRAM RAJPUT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the appellant's plea under Section 66(1)(b) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, finding that the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof required to challenge the prosecution's case. The court upheld the conviction based on the evidence presented, relying on Articles 281 of the Indian Constitution and Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in its reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 200/2026
The court dismissed the appellant's plea under Section 66(1)(b) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, finding that the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof required to challenge the prosecution's case. The court upheld the conviction based on the evidence presented, relying on Articles 281 of the Indian Constitution and Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in its reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts