GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs DINESHKUMAR BABULAL KALURAMJI KHELERI VISHOI Advocate - K P KHANDELWAL — 1906/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,116(2),98(2),81,83. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK090023012025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1906/2025
Filing Date
24-12-2025
Registration No
1906/2025
Registration Date
24-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANERA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195018250926
Police Station
DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DINESHKUMAR BABULAL KALURAMJI KHELERI VISHOI Advocate - K P KHANDELWAL
TARUN S/O HIRALAL LAXMICHAND RAVAL BRAHMAN
Adv. K P KHANDELWAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 30-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Dhanera acquitted both accused persons of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65(A), 116(2), 98(2), 81, 83) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution witnesses failed to corroborate key details, particularly regarding the alleged recovery of 52 bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹96,847, a Swift car worth ₹2,00,000, and a mobile phone worth ₹10,000, as the independent witnesses did not support the prosecution's case narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Dhanera acquitted both accused persons of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65(A), 116(2), 98(2), 81, 83) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution witnesses failed to corroborate key details, particularly regarding the alleged recovery of 52 bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹96,847, a Swift car worth ₹2,00,000, and a mobile phone worth ₹10,000, as the independent witnesses did not support the prosecution's case narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts