GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs HANSRAJ BABULAL AGRAWAL Advocate - R P MANSURI, B L GURJAR — 760/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 507,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK090009302022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
760/2022
Filing Date
22-08-2022
Registration No
760/2022
Registration Date
22-08-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANERA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195018220404
Police Station
DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HANSRAJ BABULAL AGRAWAL Advocate - R P MANSURI, B L GURJAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 05-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 19-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Dhanera Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Hansraj Babulal Agarwal of charges under IPC Section 507 (criminal intimidation by anonymous communication) due to insufficient evidence. The complainant alleged the accused made abusive calls and threats on 22 June 2022, but the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as key evidence like call recordings and independent witness testimony were absent, and the complainant did not appear consistently in court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Dhanera Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Hansraj Babulal Agarwal of charges under IPC Section 507 (criminal intimidation by anonymous communication) due to insufficient evidence. The complainant alleged the accused made abusive calls and threats on 22 June 2022, but the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, as key evidence like call recordings and independent witness testimony were absent, and the complainant did not appear consistently in court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts