GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs AMRATBHAI AYDANBHAI BHETOR Advocate - J V TRIVEDI — 651/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294KH,506-2,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK090008322023

Filing Number

651/2023

Filing Date

25-May-2023

Registration No

651/2023

Registration Date

25-May-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANERA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195018210036

Police Station

DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,294KH,506-2,114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMRATBHAI AYDANBHAI BHETOR Advocate - J V TRIVEDI

  2. 2.RAHULBHAI AMRATBHAI BHETOR

  3. 3.JITENDRABHAI NEMABHAI BHETOR

  4. 4.VINODBHAI NEMABHAI BHETOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The Dhanera First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted four accused persons under IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 506(2), 114, and GP Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of assault, abusive language, and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant's evidence and the Panchayat record did not credibly establish that the accused had beaten the victim or made death threats, as the accused's cross-examination testimony contradicted the prosecution's allegations without corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 26-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 09-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 30-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 11-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 25-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 651/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Dhanera First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted four accused persons under IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 506(2), 114, and GP Act Section 135, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of assault, abusive language, and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the complainant's evidence and the Panchayat record did not credibly establish that the accused had beaten the victim or made death threats, as the accused's cross-examination testimony contradicted the prosecution's allegations without corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case