GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs VASHRAMBHAI CHUNABHAI GALCHAR — 639/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294KH,337,506-2,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK090008202023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

639/2023

Filing Date

25-05-2023

Registration No

639/2023

Registration Date

25-05-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANERA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195018210035

Police Station

DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,294KH,337,506-2,114

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VASHRAMBHAI CHUNABHAI GALCHAR

RATNABHAI CHUNABHAI GALCHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

05-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-01-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

COURT DECISION SUMMARY In Criminal Case No. 639/2023, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanera, acquitted both accused (Vasrambhai Chunabhai Galchar and Ratnabhai Chunabhai Galchar) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 337, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted, abused, or threatened the complainant during a dispute over vehicle rental payment; the complainant's own testimony under cross-examination did not corroborate the allegations of injury or threats. The benefit of doubt was granted to the accused, and they were discharged under BNS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

COURT DECISION SUMMARY In Criminal Case No. 639/2023, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanera, acquitted both accused (Vasrambhai Chunabhai Galchar and Ratnabhai Chunabhai Galchar) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 337, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted, abused, or threatened the complainant during a dispute over vehicle rental payment; the complainant's own testimony under cross-examination did not corroborate the allegations of injury or threats. The benefit of doubt was granted to the accused, and they were discharged under BNS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DHANERA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case