GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs VASHRAMBHAI CHUNABHAI GALCHAR — 639/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294KH,337,506-2,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK090008202023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
639/2023
Filing Date
25-05-2023
Registration No
639/2023
Registration Date
25-05-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANERA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195018210035
Police Station
DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VASHRAMBHAI CHUNABHAI GALCHAR
RATNABHAI CHUNABHAI GALCHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 05-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 15-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
COURT DECISION SUMMARY In Criminal Case No. 639/2023, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanera, acquitted both accused (Vasrambhai Chunabhai Galchar and Ratnabhai Chunabhai Galchar) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 337, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted, abused, or threatened the complainant during a dispute over vehicle rental payment; the complainant's own testimony under cross-examination did not corroborate the allegations of injury or threats. The benefit of doubt was granted to the accused, and they were discharged under BNS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
COURT DECISION SUMMARY In Criminal Case No. 639/2023, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanera, acquitted both accused (Vasrambhai Chunabhai Galchar and Ratnabhai Chunabhai Galchar) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 337, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused assaulted, abused, or threatened the complainant during a dispute over vehicle rental payment; the complainant's own testimony under cross-examination did not corroborate the allegations of injury or threats. The benefit of doubt was granted to the accused, and they were discharged under BNS Section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts