GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KISHANBHAI PRAHLADBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - K P KHANDELWAL — 308/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,294(B),506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK090004142024
Filing Number
308/2024
Filing Date
26-Feb-2024
Registration No
308/2024
Registration Date
26-Feb-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANERA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195036240032
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHANBHAI PRAHLADBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - K P KHANDELWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The Dhanera First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Kishnbhai Prahlad Bhai Chauhan) of charges under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 294(b), 506(2), and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 7, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of physical abuse, mental harassment, dowry demands, and death threats beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish its case despite presenting the complainant and her parents as witnesses, as their testimonies lacked corroborating evidence and contradicted the accused's cross-examination statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 308/2024
Case Summary The Dhanera First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Kishnbhai Prahlad Bhai Chauhan) of charges under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 294(b), 506(2), and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 7, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of physical abuse, mental harassment, dowry demands, and death threats beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish its case despite presenting the complainant and her parents as witnesses, as their testimonies lacked corroborating evidence and contradicted the accused's cross-examination statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts