GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs KISHANBHAI PRAHLADBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - K P KHANDELWAL — 308/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,294(B),506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK090004142024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
308/2024
Filing Date
26-02-2024
Registration No
308/2024
Registration Date
26-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANERA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195036240032
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KISHANBHAI PRAHLADBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - K P KHANDELWAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Dhanera First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Kishnbhai Prahlad Bhai Chauhan) of charges under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 294(b), 506(2), and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 7, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of physical abuse, mental harassment, dowry demands, and death threats beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish its case despite presenting the complainant and her parents as witnesses, as their testimonies lacked corroborating evidence and contradicted the accused's cross-examination statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Dhanera First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Kishnbhai Prahlad Bhai Chauhan) of charges under IPC sections 498(A), 323, 294(b), 506(2), and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 7, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of physical abuse, mental harassment, dowry demands, and death threats beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish its case despite presenting the complainant and her parents as witnesses, as their testimonies lacked corroborating evidence and contradicted the accused's cross-examination statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts