Government of Gujarat vs JAGTABHAI DHANABHAI RABARI — 1103/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(b),324(4),351(3),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK080015812025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1103/2025
Filing Date
01-11-2025
Registration No
1103/2025
Registration Date
01-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, THARAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195050250806
Police Station
THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAGTABHAI DHANABHAI RABARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tharad, acquitted the accused Jagtabhaid Dhanabhaid Rabari of all charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(b), 324(4), and 351(3). The court found that the complainant failed to prove the allegations of threatening, assault with an axe, and causing damage to vehicles beyond reasonable doubt, as the testimonies of the two key witnesses contradicted the formal complaint and lacked credible corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tharad, acquitted the accused Jagtabhaid Dhanabhaid Rabari of all charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(b), 324(4), and 351(3). The court found that the complainant failed to prove the allegations of threatening, assault with an axe, and causing damage to vehicles beyond reasonable doubt, as the testimonies of the two key witnesses contradicted the formal complaint and lacked credible corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts