SHITABEN D/O KALABHAI BHIL vs SAHUBEN W/O VAGHABHAI BHIL Advocate - N S MAJIRANA — 60/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK080011832023
Filing Number
60/2023
Filing Date
06-Oct-2023
Registration No
60/2023
Registration Date
06-Oct-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, THARAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHITABEN D/O KALABHAI BHIL
Adv. H H JOSHI
-
2.DHARMIBEN D/O KALABHAI BHIL
Adv. H H JOSHI
-
3.KANKUBEN D/O KALABHAI BHIL
Adv. H H JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAHUBEN W/O VAGHABHAI BHIL Advocate - N S MAJIRANA
-
2.SHANTABEN SHANKARBHAI BHIL
Adv. N S MAJIRANA
-
3.SHARDABEN W/O PUNMAJI BHIL
Adv. N S MAJIRANA
-
4.BHAMRAJI S/O PUNMAJI BHIL
Adv. N S MAJIRANA
-
5.SHANJAYBHAI S/O PUNMAJI BHIL
Adv. N S MAJIRANA
-
6.KHANABHAI S/O PUNMAJI BHIL
Adv. N S MAJIRANA
-
7.SURESHBHAI S/O SHANKARBHAI BHIL
Adv. N S MAJIRANA
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Aug-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
-
26-Jul-2024
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary The High Court of Gujarat dismissed the plaintiffs' petition for declaratory relief and mandatory injunction regarding ancestral agricultural land. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case due to lack of proper documentation, evidence of continuous possession, and procedural defects in their claims, while also finding that the defendants had raised valid legal objections to the plaintiffs' assertions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jul-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Jun-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Apr-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Mar-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Nov-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 60/2023
Court Order Summary The High Court of Gujarat dismissed the plaintiffs' petition for declaratory relief and mandatory injunction regarding ancestral agricultural land. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish their case due to lack of proper documentation, evidence of continuous possession, and procedural defects in their claims, while also finding that the defendants had raised valid legal objections to the plaintiffs' assertions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts