Government of Gujarat vs ANIRUDHSHINH HADMATSHINH VAGHELA Advocate - S U SODHA — 555/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 332,186,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK080008392023

Filing Number

555/2023

Filing Date

31-Jul-2023

Registration No

555/2023

Registration Date

31-Jul-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, THARAD

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195050220820

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 332,186,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANIRUDHSHINH HADMATSHINH VAGHELA Advocate - S U SODHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Anirudhsinh Hadmatsinh Vaghe la under IPC sections 332, 186, and 506(2) for allegedly assaulting government employees during a mobile tower repair operation in Thrad. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies, contradictions between complainants' statements and medical records regarding the nature of injuries (blunt vs. sharp weapon), and lack of corroborating evidence, thereby granting the accused the benefit of doubt as per legal precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 16-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 06-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 01-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 01-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 20-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 03-Oct-2023

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 21-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 31-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 555/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Anirudhsinh Hadmatsinh Vaghe la under IPC sections 332, 186, and 506(2) for allegedly assaulting government employees during a mobile tower repair operation in Thrad. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies in witness testimonies, contradictions between complainants' statements and medical records regarding the nature of injuries (blunt vs. sharp weapon), and lack of corroborating evidence, thereby granting the accused the benefit of doubt as per legal precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case