Government of Gujarat vs JAVRARAM HANSARAM GARG Advocate - S S SAMEJA — 438/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK080007252024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
438/2024
Filing Date
21-05-2024
Registration No
438/2024
Registration Date
21-05-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, THARAD
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195050240026
Police Station
THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP, S S RATHOD
Respondent(s)
JAVRARAM HANSARAM GARG Advocate - S S SAMEJA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 31-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 02-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Javaraam Hansaram Garg of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(A), and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134 in a fatal road accident case. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently, causing the death of Maghabhai Devabhai Chaudhri. The court noted that witnesses could not identify the driver or provide concrete evidence of rash/negligent driving, and held that "high speed" is a relative term requiring material evidence on record to establish negligence in the specific circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Javaraam Hansaram Garg of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(A), and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134 in a fatal road accident case. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently, causing the death of Maghabhai Devabhai Chaudhri. The court noted that witnesses could not identify the driver or provide concrete evidence of rash/negligent driving, and held that "high speed" is a relative term requiring material evidence on record to establish negligence in the specific circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts