Government of Gujarat vs JAVRARAM HANSARAM GARG Advocate - S S SAMEJA — 438/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK080007252024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

438/2024

Filing Date

21-05-2024

Registration No

438/2024

Registration Date

21-05-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, THARAD

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195050240026

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,304(A),
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184,134,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP, S S RATHOD

Respondent(s)

JAVRARAM HANSARAM GARG Advocate - S S SAMEJA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

02-05-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

31-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

02-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Javaraam Hansaram Garg of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(A), and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134 in a fatal road accident case. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently, causing the death of Maghabhai Devabhai Chaudhri. The court noted that witnesses could not identify the driver or provide concrete evidence of rash/negligent driving, and held that "high speed" is a relative term requiring material evidence on record to establish negligence in the specific circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Javaraam Hansaram Garg of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(A), and MV Act Sections 177, 184, 134 in a fatal road accident case. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused drove recklessly or negligently, causing the death of Maghabhai Devabhai Chaudhri. The court noted that witnesses could not identify the driver or provide concrete evidence of rash/negligent driving, and held that "high speed" is a relative term requiring material evidence on record to establish negligence in the specific circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, THARAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case