HEIRS OF LATE SIPAI JALALBHAI DADUJI vs HEIRS OF ALISERDADU RAJU Advocate - N V ASAL — 14/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK080004632022
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
14/2022
Filing Date
27-04-2022
Registration No
14/2022
Registration Date
27-04-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, THARAD
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEIRS OF LATE SIPAI JALALBHAI DADUJI
Adv. I A SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
HEIRS OF ALISERDADU RAJU Advocate - N V ASAL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 30-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 12-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in a civil suit involving ancestral property dispute. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, that the balance of convenience favored the defendant, and that no irreparable loss would result from refusing the injunction, particularly given the transaction occurred 30+ years prior and remained unchallenged until 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in a civil suit involving ancestral property dispute. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, that the balance of convenience favored the defendant, and that no irreparable loss would result from refusing the injunction, particularly given the transaction occurred 30+ years prior and remained unchallenged until 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts