Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI KHUSHALBHAI RAJGOR Advocate - C V DAVE — 222/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa,116(b). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK080003232026

Filing Number

222/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, THARAD

Judge

3-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996006251125

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa,116(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINODBHAI KHUSHALBHAI RAJGOR Advocate - C V DAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted accused Vinodbhai Khushalbhai Rajgor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65(A)(A), 116(B)) for illegal possession of 90 bottles of country liquor. The court found the prosecution's case baseless and doubtful, primarily because the panchnama witness turned hostile, denying that the document was prepared in his presence and stating he merely signed a ready-made form. Additionally, the investigation lacked independent witnesses and showed procedural irregularities, preventing the prosecution from proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted accused Vinodbhai Khushalbhai Rajgor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65(A)(A), 116(B)) for illegal possession of 90 bottles of country liquor. The court found the prosecution's case baseless and doubtful, primarily because the panchnama witness turned hostile, denying that the document was prepared in his presence and stating he merely signed a ready-made form. Additionally, the investigation lacked independent witnesses and showed procedural irregularities, preventing the prosecution from proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case