Government of Gujarat vs PRAKASHBHAI PRADHANJI THAKOR Advocate - K D PRAJAPATI — 212/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa,116(b),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK080003062026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

212/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

212/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, THARAD

Judge

3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

119960062500871

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65aa,116(b),

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRAKASHBHAI PRADHANJI THAKOR Advocate - K D PRAJAPATI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

02-05-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

10-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

03-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Court Decision The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Tharad acquitted accused Prakashbhai Pradhanji Thakor of charges under the Prohibition Act Sections 65(A)(A) and 116(B) for allegedly possessing 14 bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹2,172. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including absence of independent witnesses, lack of proper documentation of the panchnama (seizure memo), and failure to establish the accused's conscious possession of the contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Tharad acquitted accused Prakashbhai Pradhanji Thakor of charges under the Prohibition Act Sections 65(A)(A) and 116(B) for allegedly possessing 14 bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹2,172. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including absence of independent witnesses, lack of proper documentation of the panchnama (seizure memo), and failure to establish the accused's conscious possession of the contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, THARAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case