Government of Gujarat vs PRAKASHBHAI PRADHANJI THAKOR Advocate - K D PRAJAPATI — 212/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65aa,116(b),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK080003062026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
212/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
212/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, THARAD
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
119960062500871
Police Station
THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAKASHBHAI PRADHANJI THAKOR Advocate - K D PRAJAPATI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 03-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Tharad acquitted accused Prakashbhai Pradhanji Thakor of charges under the Prohibition Act Sections 65(A)(A) and 116(B) for allegedly possessing 14 bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹2,172. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including absence of independent witnesses, lack of proper documentation of the panchnama (seizure memo), and failure to establish the accused's conscious possession of the contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Tharad acquitted accused Prakashbhai Pradhanji Thakor of charges under the Prohibition Act Sections 65(A)(A) and 116(B) for allegedly possessing 14 bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹2,172. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical evidentiary gaps including absence of independent witnesses, lack of proper documentation of the panchnama (seizure memo), and failure to establish the accused's conscious possession of the contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts