Government of Gujarat vs VELABHAI JOYTABHAI PADHAR(RAJPUT) Advocate - D M PATEL — 150/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,116(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK080002242026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
150/2026
Filing Date
03-02-2026
Registration No
150/2026
Registration Date
03-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, THARAD
Judge
3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996006251353
Police Station
THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VELABHAI JOYTABHAI PADHAR(RAJPUT) Advocate - D M PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In Criminal Case No. 150/2026, the Thrad First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Velabhai Joyatabhai Padhar of charges under the Prohibition Act, Sections 65(a)(i) and 116(b), regarding alleged possession of foreign liquor bottles. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquor was in the accused's conscious possession, noting critical evidentiary gaps including absence of independent witnesses, incomplete panchnama documentation, and lack of chemical analysis reports to confirm the liquor's authenticity. Applying established judicial principles on burden of proof in criminal proceedings, the court held that the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to overcome reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Criminal Case No. 150/2026, the Thrad First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Velabhai Joyatabhai Padhar of charges under the Prohibition Act, Sections 65(a)(i) and 116(b), regarding alleged possession of foreign liquor bottles. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquor was in the accused's conscious possession, noting critical evidentiary gaps including absence of independent witnesses, incomplete panchnama documentation, and lack of chemical analysis reports to confirm the liquor's authenticity. Applying established judicial principles on burden of proof in criminal proceedings, the court held that the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to overcome reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts