JOSHI RANIBEN W/O RAMCHANDBHAI vs JOSHI RAMCHANDBHAI JAGMALBHAI Advocate - V K VEN — 64/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBK070004942023

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

64/2023

Filing Date

29-05-2023

Registration No

64/2023

Registration Date

29-05-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, WAV

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,36,

Petitioner(s)

JOSHI RANIBEN W/O RAMCHANDBHAI

Adv. N R SOLANKI

JOSHI URMILABEN D/O RAMCHANDBHAI

JOSHI HETALBEN D/O RAMCHANDBHAI

Respondent(s)

JOSHI RAMCHANDBHAI JAGMALBHAI Advocate - V K VEN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

13-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

10-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

20-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

23-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

18-11-2025

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

08-07-2024
JUDEGEMENT
08-07-2024
JUDEGEMENT

SUMMARY: The interim injunction application filed by the plaintiffs (Joshi Raniben and daughters) against the defendant (Joshi Ramchandbhai) has been allowed in part. The court directed the defendant to maintain status quo on the disputed property (revenue survey no. 518/paiki 2, village Morikha, Wav, Banaskantha) until final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case established, as the defendant allegedly executed a fraudulent affidavit and an agreement to sell the jointly-held property to a third party after the suit was filed, thereby jeopardizing the plaintiffs' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The interim injunction application filed by the plaintiffs (Joshi Raniben and daughters) against the defendant (Joshi Ramchandbhai) has been allowed in part. The court directed the defendant to maintain status quo on the disputed property (revenue survey no. 518/paiki 2, village Morikha, Wav, Banaskantha) until final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case established, as the defendant allegedly executed a fraudulent affidavit and an agreement to sell the jointly-held property to a third party after the suit was filed, thereby jeopardizing the plaintiffs' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, WAV All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case