JOSHI RANIBEN W/O RAMCHANDBHAI vs JOSHI RAMCHANDBHAI JAGMALBHAI Advocate - V K VEN — 64/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK070004942023
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
64/2023
Filing Date
29-05-2023
Registration No
64/2023
Registration Date
29-05-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, WAV
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JOSHI RANIBEN W/O RAMCHANDBHAI
Adv. N R SOLANKI
JOSHI URMILABEN D/O RAMCHANDBHAI
JOSHI HETALBEN D/O RAMCHANDBHAI
Respondent(s)
JOSHI RAMCHANDBHAI JAGMALBHAI Advocate - V K VEN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 20-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 18-11-2025 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The interim injunction application filed by the plaintiffs (Joshi Raniben and daughters) against the defendant (Joshi Ramchandbhai) has been allowed in part. The court directed the defendant to maintain status quo on the disputed property (revenue survey no. 518/paiki 2, village Morikha, Wav, Banaskantha) until final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case established, as the defendant allegedly executed a fraudulent affidavit and an agreement to sell the jointly-held property to a third party after the suit was filed, thereby jeopardizing the plaintiffs' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The interim injunction application filed by the plaintiffs (Joshi Raniben and daughters) against the defendant (Joshi Ramchandbhai) has been allowed in part. The court directed the defendant to maintain status quo on the disputed property (revenue survey no. 518/paiki 2, village Morikha, Wav, Banaskantha) until final disposal of the suit. The court found a prima facie case established, as the defendant allegedly executed a fraudulent affidavit and an agreement to sell the jointly-held property to a third party after the suit was filed, thereby jeopardizing the plaintiffs' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts