Rajiben Nagjibhai Jagashibhai Patel w.o Khonabhai Rashingbhai vs Hirabhai Nagjibhai Patel — 21/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,37,. Status: DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK070002712023
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
21/2023
Filing Date
10-02-2023
Registration No
21/2023
Registration Date
10-02-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, WAV
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajiben Nagjibhai Jagashibhai Patel w.o Khonabhai Rashingbhai
Adv. K K CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
Hirabhai Nagjibhai Patel
Romabhai Nagjibhai Patel
Adv. N V ASAL
Varjangbhai Jagshibhai Patel
Adv. A K PATEL
Maliben Jagshibhai Patel(Abated)
Dharmiben Jagshibhai Patel
Adv. A K PATEL
Mavjibhai Karnabhai Patel
Adv. A K PATEL
Patel Arjanbhai Bhonaji
Adv. N V ASAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 12-01-2026 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 24-11-2025 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 30-09-2025 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE | |
| 04-08-2025 | DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim injunction restraining the defendant from alienating disputed land. The Principal Civil Judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case, citing delay of 35 years in challenging a 1988 revenue entry, inconsistent statements in related suits, and the principle that "law does not help one who sleeps over their rights." Costs awarded against the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim injunction restraining the defendant from alienating disputed land. The Principal Civil Judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case, citing delay of 35 years in challenging a 1988 revenue entry, inconsistent statements in related suits, and the principle that "law does not help one who sleeps over their rights." Costs awarded against the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts