Government of Gujarat vs MUKANDARBHAI NURMAHAMADBHAI RATHOD Advocate - M M SOLANKI — 1278/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116(2), 98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK060015562025

Filing Number

1278/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

1278/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996003250950

Police Station

DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116(2), 98(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKANDARBHAI NURMAHAMADBHAI RATHOD Advocate - M M SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Diyoddar acquitted the accused (Mukunderbhai Nurmahembhai Rathod) in a Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps including the lack of proper panchnama (official record) corroboration, failure to examine the producer of the seized foreign liquor, and absence of scientific examination reports—determining that mere circumstantial evidence and interested witness testimony were insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1278/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Diyoddar acquitted the accused (Mukunderbhai Nurmahembhai Rathod) in a Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps including the lack of proper panchnama (official record) corroboration, failure to examine the producer of the seized foreign liquor, and absence of scientific examination reports—determining that mere circumstantial evidence and interested witness testimony were insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case