Government of Gujarat vs DINESHBHAI DUNGARBHAI BHEDRU (CHAUDAHRY) Advocate - P C NAI — 1187/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK060014462025

Filing Number

1187/2025

Filing Date

27-Oct-2025

Registration No

1187/2025

Registration Date

27-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195017250705

Police Station

DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-AA,116(2),66(1)2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI DUNGARBHAI BHEDRU (CHAUDAHRY) Advocate - P C NAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The court acquitted the accused (Dineshbhai Dungarabhai Bheduchidhri) of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(e), 116(2), 66(1)(b), and MV Act Section 185, finding insufficient evidence that the accused was driving under the influence of alcohol. The court determined that while the accused was found with contraband alcohol, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that he had consumed alcohol or was impaired while driving, as critical medical tests and proper procedures were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 11-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 27-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1187/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused (Dineshbhai Dungarabhai Bheduchidhri) of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(e), 116(2), 66(1)(b), and MV Act Section 185, finding insufficient evidence that the accused was driving under the influence of alcohol. The court determined that while the accused was found with contraband alcohol, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that he had consumed alcohol or was impaired while driving, as critical medical tests and proper procedures were not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case