Government of Gujarat vs VINODKUMAR S/O PRAKASHCHAND BHAGARAM SAHU (NAI) Advocate - B K PARMAR — 936/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(E),116(2),98(2) 81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK060011092025

Filing Number

936/2025

Filing Date

08-Aug-2025

Registration No

936/2025

Registration Date

08-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195017250290

Police Station

DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(E),116(2),98(2) 81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINODKUMAR S/O PRAKASHCHAND BHAGARAM SAHU (NAI) Advocate - B K PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused in this Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The critical witnesses turned hostile, the panchnama (seizure record) lacked proper corroboration, and the investigating officer failed to examine the accused regarding the seized foreign liquor bottles. Without conclusive evidence, the court ruled the accused not guilty under IPC Section 271(1) and ordered acquittal with seizure of contraband liquor and fine provisions per IPC Section 481(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 29-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 08-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 936/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused in this Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The critical witnesses turned hostile, the panchnama (seizure record) lacked proper corroboration, and the investigating officer failed to examine the accused regarding the seized foreign liquor bottles. Without conclusive evidence, the court ruled the accused not guilty under IPC Section 271(1) and ordered acquittal with seizure of contraband liquor and fine provisions per IPC Section 481(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case