Government of Gujarat vs VINODKUMAR S/O PRAKASHCHAND BHAGARAM SAHU (NAI) Advocate - B K PARMAR — 936/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A),(E),116(2),98(2) 81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK060011092025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
936/2025
Filing Date
08-08-2025
Registration No
936/2025
Registration Date
08-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195017250290
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VINODKUMAR S/O PRAKASHCHAND BHAGARAM SAHU (NAI) Advocate - B K PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 24-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused in this Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The critical witnesses turned hostile, the panchnama (seizure record) lacked proper corroboration, and the investigating officer failed to examine the accused regarding the seized foreign liquor bottles. Without conclusive evidence, the court ruled the accused not guilty under IPC Section 271(1) and ordered acquittal with seizure of contraband liquor and fine provisions per IPC Section 481(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused in this Prohibition Act case, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The critical witnesses turned hostile, the panchnama (seizure record) lacked proper corroboration, and the investigating officer failed to examine the accused regarding the seized foreign liquor bottles. Without conclusive evidence, the court ruled the accused not guilty under IPC Section 271(1) and ordered acquittal with seizure of contraband liquor and fine provisions per IPC Section 481(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts