LAVAR(PANCHAL ) RAMJIBHAI BHALABHAI(Legal Heir) vs MALI PRATABJI DEVJIJI Advocate - P P GOSAI — 28/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 23-Apr-2026

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBK060010642022

Filing Number

28/2022

Filing Date

08-Aug-2022

Registration No

28/2022

Registration Date

08-Aug-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAVAR(PANCHAL ) RAMJIBHAI BHALABHAI(Legal Heir)

    Adv. R H THAKKER1.

  2. 2.PANCHAL MAFABHAI SHIVAABHAI 1.

  3. 3.PANCHAL BABUBHAI SHIVABHAI 1.

  4. 4.PANCHAL GOMIBEN SHIVABHAI 1.

  5. 5.PANCHAL GODIBEN SHIVABHAI 1.

  6. 6.PANCHAL RUKHIBE DAYABHAI 1.

  7. 7.PANCHAL SHARDABEN DAYABHAI 1.

  8. 8.PANCHAL SOMABHAI DAYABHAI 1.

  9. 9.PANCHAL NAGJIBHAI DAYABHAI 1.

  10. 10.PANCHAL KANTIBHAI DAYABHAI 1.

  11. 11.PANCHAL CHAMANBHAI DAYABHAI 1.

  12. 12.PANCHAL DHUDIBEN RAMJI 1.

  13. 13.PANCHAL LAKHMANBHAI DAYABHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALI PRATABJI DEVJIJI Advocate - P P GOSAI

  2. 2.NAYAB IJANER SHRI

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 29-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 18-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 28-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 22-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 21-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 08-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 24-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 10-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 08-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 08-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 18-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 25-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 28-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 06-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 16-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 19-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 22-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 09-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 26-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 11-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 13-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 31-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 12-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 26-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 13-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 03-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 18-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 04-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  41. 28-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  42. 12-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  43. 04-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  44. 14-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  45. 19-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  46. 03-Jan-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  47. 19-Dec-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  48. 29-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  49. 16-Oct-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  50. 29-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  51. 25-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  52. 06-Sep-2023

    OrderView PDF

  53. 06-Sep-2023

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 28-2022 – Interim Injunction Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain electricity disconnection of mortgaged agricultural land. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked proper legal standing, and produced insufficient evidence to demonstrate the required elements for interim relief (balance of convenience and irreparable loss). The court also noted material legal infirmities, including ambiguous facts in the plaint and the disputed location of the electricity connection relative to the mortgaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  54. 06-Sep-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  55. 31-Aug-2023

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  56. 01-Aug-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  57. 11-Jul-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  58. 26-Jun-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  59. 05-Jun-2023

    OrderView PDF

  60. 05-Jun-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  61. 16-May-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  62. 03-May-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  63. 17-Apr-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  64. 18-Mar-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  65. 11-Feb-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  66. 12-Jan-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  67. 12-Dec-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  68. 18-Oct-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  69. 05-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 08-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 28-2022 – Interim Injunction Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain electricity disconnection of mortgaged agricultural land. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked proper legal standing, and produced insufficient evidence to demonstrate the required elements for interim relief (balance of convenience and irreparable loss). The court also noted material legal infirmities, including ambiguous facts in the plaint and the disputed location of the electricity connection relative to the mortgaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case