LAVAR(PANCHAL ) RAMJIBHAI BHALABHAI(Legal Heir) vs MALI PRATABJI DEVJIJI Advocate - P P GOSAI — 28/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK060010642022
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2022
Filing Date
08-08-2022
Registration No
28/2022
Registration Date
08-08-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAVAR(PANCHAL ) RAMJIBHAI BHALABHAI(Legal Heir)
Adv. R H THAKKER1.
PANCHAL MAFABHAI SHIVAABHAI 1.
PANCHAL BABUBHAI SHIVABHAI 1.
PANCHAL GOMIBEN SHIVABHAI 1.
PANCHAL GODIBEN SHIVABHAI 1.
PANCHAL RUKHIBE DAYABHAI 1.
PANCHAL SHARDABEN DAYABHAI 1.
PANCHAL SOMABHAI DAYABHAI 1.
PANCHAL NAGJIBHAI DAYABHAI 1.
PANCHAL KANTIBHAI DAYABHAI 1.
PANCHAL CHAMANBHAI DAYABHAI 1.
PANCHAL DHUDIBEN RAMJI 1.
PANCHAL LAKHMANBHAI DAYABHAI
Respondent(s)
MALI PRATABJI DEVJIJI Advocate - P P GOSAI
NAYAB IJANER SHRI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 20-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 05-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 16-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 28-2022 – Interim Injunction Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain electricity disconnection of mortgaged agricultural land. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked proper legal standing, and produced insufficient evidence to demonstrate the required elements for interim relief (balance of convenience and irreparable loss). The court also noted material legal infirmities, including ambiguous facts in the plaint and the disputed location of the electricity connection relative to the mortgaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 28-2022 – Interim Injunction Application Rejected The court rejected the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain electricity disconnection of mortgaged agricultural land. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked proper legal standing, and produced insufficient evidence to demonstrate the required elements for interim relief (balance of convenience and irreparable loss). The court also noted material legal infirmities, including ambiguous facts in the plaint and the disputed location of the electricity connection relative to the mortgaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts