AMARATBHAI KALABHAI NAI vs PRAHLADBHAI AMBARAMBHAI OD Advocate - H T JOSHI — 22/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK060005762022
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
22/2022
Filing Date
11-04-2022
Registration No
22/2022
Registration Date
11-04-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMARATBHAI KALABHAI NAI
Adv. N M RABARI
JABIBEN MAFABHAI NAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI SAILESHKUMAR MAFABHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI KAMLESHKUMAR MAFABHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI ASHOKKUMAR MAFABHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI VIMUBEN MAFABHAI
Adv. N M RABARI
NAI BABUBHAI VALABHAI
NAI SOMABHAI VALABHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI LAKHAMANABHAI VALABHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI LILIBEN VALABHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI RAJESHBHAI ISAVARBHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI SURESHBHAI ISAVARBHAI-
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI VIMALABEN ISAVARBHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI MALABHAI HARIBHAI
Adv. N M RABARI
NAI PUNABHAI HARIBHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
NAI BABUBHAI HARIBHAI
Adv. M H MULANI
Respondent(s)
PRAHLADBHAI AMBARAMBHAI OD Advocate - H T JOSHI
OD JAYANTIBHAI AMBARAMBHAI
Adv. H T JOSHI
OD NATUBHAI AMBARAMBHAI
Adv. H T JOSHI
OD GAFURBHAI AMBARAMBHAI
Adv. H T JOSHI
THAKKAR DARSANKUMAR THAKARSIBHAI
Adv. H T JOSHI
ISAVARBHAI JEVATABHAI TARAK
Adv. H T JOSHI
MALABHAI SAGARAMBHAI PATEL
Adv. H T JOSHI
PARAGBHAI MANCHHABHAI JOSHI
Adv. H T JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 20-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 06-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 29-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 22-2022 | Interim Injunction Application Order The court partly allowed the interim injunction application and ordered both parties to maintain status quo on the disputed property until final judgment. The suit involves a land dispute over survey numbers 97-100 in village Deodar regarding 12 acres allegedly sold to defendants' predecessors in 1967, with plaintiffs claiming defendants illegally possess additional land (1.14-40 sq.mtrs). The court found the factual situation ambiguous with insufficient documentary evidence from both sides but determined that preventing further property transactions was necessary to protect the final judgment's effectiveness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 22-2022 | Interim Injunction Application Order The court partly allowed the interim injunction application and ordered both parties to maintain status quo on the disputed property until final judgment. The suit involves a land dispute over survey numbers 97-100 in village Deodar regarding 12 acres allegedly sold to defendants' predecessors in 1967, with plaintiffs claiming defendants illegally possess additional land (1.14-40 sq.mtrs). The court found the factual situation ambiguous with insufficient documentary evidence from both sides but determined that preventing further property transactions was necessary to protect the final judgment's effectiveness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts