ALPESHKUMAR BHUPENDRABHAI SONI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 60/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBK060003712026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
60/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
60/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996003260114
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ALPESHKUMAR BHUPENDRABHAI SONI
Adv. R C MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate court in Diyodar, Banaskantha district granted the petition filed by Alpeshkumar Rupendra Soni for release of his seized Samsung A33 5G mobile phone (with Vodafon SIM 8140000395 and specified IMEI numbers), holding that ownership was established through documentary evidence and police seizure without proper justification. The court ordered release of the mobile phone upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with the condition that the accused shall not use it for any unlawful purpose and shall produce it before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate court in Diyodar, Banaskantha district granted the petition filed by Alpeshkumar Rupendra Soni for release of his seized Samsung A33 5G mobile phone (with Vodafon SIM 8140000395 and specified IMEI numbers), holding that ownership was established through documentary evidence and police seizure without proper justification. The court ordered release of the mobile phone upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with the condition that the accused shall not use it for any unlawful purpose and shall produce it before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts