NASIRKHAN UMARKHAN MALEK vs Government of Gujarat (Deodar police station) Advocate - APP — 48/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 28th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBK060003452026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
48/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996003260062
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NASIRKHAN UMARKHAN MALEK
Adv. J D PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat (Deodar police station) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-04-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 21-04-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 17-04-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-04-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's application seeking restoration of a seized vehicle (pickup truck). The court found that the petitioner was the lawful owner and possessor of the vehicle, which was seized during a criminal investigation. However, the court rejected the application because the vehicle had been handed over to another person (Nawab Ahmad) through a documented transfer on December 9, 2025, making the petitioner no longer entitled to seek its recovery as the ownership had been transferred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's application seeking restoration of a seized vehicle (pickup truck). The court found that the petitioner was the lawful owner and possessor of the vehicle, which was seized during a criminal investigation. However, the court rejected the application because the vehicle had been handed over to another person (Nawab Ahmad) through a documented transfer on December 9, 2025, making the petitioner no longer entitled to seek its recovery as the ownership had been transferred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts