Government of Gujarat vs MANSUGBHAI KARAMSHIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - C H SOLANKI — 280/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(2),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK060003372026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
280/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
280/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996003260015
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANSUGBHAI KARAMSHIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - C H SOLANKI
BHAVESHBHAI MANSUGBHAI PARMAR
Adv. C H SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary This Gujarati criminal judgment (Case No. 280/2026, decided March 13, 2026) acquits the two accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 288(2), and Gujarat Police Act Section 133, finding insufficient evidence that they caused grievous injury to the complainant. The court determined that the complainant and witnesses' testimonies contained significant contradictions and lacked corroborating evidence to establish the alleged assault beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary This Gujarati criminal judgment (Case No. 280/2026, decided March 13, 2026) acquits the two accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 288(2), and Gujarat Police Act Section 133, finding insufficient evidence that they caused grievous injury to the complainant. The court determined that the complainant and witnesses' testimonies contained significant contradictions and lacked corroborating evidence to establish the alleged assault beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts