Government of Gujarat vs GIRISHKUMAR SHANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - B K PARMAR — 279/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(2),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK060003362026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
279/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
279/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996003260016
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GIRISHKUMAR SHANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - B K PARMAR
GEETABEN W/O SHANTIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. B K PARMAR
LILABHAI AALABHAI PARMAR
Adv. B K PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the three accused of charges under BNS Sections 115(2), 288(2), and 74 (related to criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony was contradicted by other witness accounts and lacked sufficient corroboration to establish the crime conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the three accused of charges under BNS Sections 115(2), 288(2), and 74 (related to criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's testimony was contradicted by other witness accounts and lacked sufficient corroboration to establish the crime conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts