AAL BHARTIBEN AMRATBHAI vs Government of Gujarat (deodar police station) Advocate - APP — 27/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 452. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBK060002182026

Filing Number

27/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEODAR

Judge

4-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 452

Petitioner(s)

1.AAL BHARTIBEN AMRATBHAI

Adv. R C MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat (deodar police station) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
29-Apr-2026

JudegementView PDF

Summary The Didwana Chief Judicial Magistrate's court rejected the plaintiff's petition seeking to recover a seized pickup truck vehicle involved in a criminal proceeding. The court found that the petitioner was the legitimate owner and pledgee of the vehicle, but held that since the vehicle was seized as evidence in a criminal case and subsequently sold as per police procedure, the petitioner had no legal right to recover it. The court ruled that the vehicle's status was governed by criminal procedure law, not civil remedies, and therefore dismissed the petition while noting the petitioner could pursue other appropriate legal avenues if warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
29-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
27-Apr-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
21-Apr-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
16-Apr-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
10-Apr-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
02-Apr-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
25-Mar-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
23-Mar-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
10-Mar-2026

Final Hearing

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
07-Mar-2026

Final Hearing

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
28-Feb-2026

Final Hearing

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
24-Feb-2026

Final Hearing

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
17-Feb-2026

Final Hearing

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
07-Feb-2026

Final Hearing

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
04-Feb-2026

Final Hearing

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
02-Feb-2026

Final Hearing

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
30-Jan-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
28-Jan-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
27-Jan-2026

Order/Judgement

Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
23-Jan-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
22-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Didwana Chief Judicial Magistrate's court rejected the plaintiff's petition seeking to recover a seized pickup truck vehicle involved in a criminal proceeding. The court found that the petitioner was the legitimate owner and pledgee of the vehicle, but held that since the vehicle was seized as evidence in a criminal case and subsequently sold as per police procedure, the petitioner had no legal right to recover it. The court ruled that the vehicle's status was governed by criminal procedure law, not civil remedies, and therefore dismissed the petition while noting the petitioner could pursue other appropriate legal avenues if warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.