Government of Gujarat vs KIRANBHAI RAMESHWARBHAI JOSHI Advocate - N M RABARI — 172/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),117(2),296(2),351(3),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK060001972026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
172/2026
Filing Date
20-01-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEODAR
Judge
4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996003250968
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KIRANBHAI RAMESHWARBHAI JOSHI Advocate - N M RABARI
SAVRAMBHAI RAMSUGBHAI JOSHI
Adv. N M RABARI
BHARATBHAI SAVRAMBHAI JOSHI
Adv. N M RABARI
KASHIRAMBHAI SAVRAMBHAI JOSHI
Adv. N M RABARI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all four defendants of charges under BNS sections 115(2), 117(2), 288(2), 351(3), 34, and Gujarat Police Act section 133, finding insufficient evidence that the prosecution proved the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasizes that while the victim provided testimony of assault occurring on January 26, 2025, the corroborating medical evidence, witness statements, and procedural documentation failed to conclusively establish the defendants' guilt according to legal standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all four defendants of charges under BNS sections 115(2), 117(2), 288(2), 351(3), 34, and Gujarat Police Act section 133, finding insufficient evidence that the prosecution proved the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasizes that while the victim provided testimony of assault occurring on January 26, 2025, the corroborating medical evidence, witness statements, and procedural documentation failed to conclusively establish the defendants' guilt according to legal standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts