Government of Gujarat vs PRADHANJI VELAJI THAKOR Advocate - R G DAVE — 4363/2024
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 29th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK040062542024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4363/2024
Filing Date
11-12-2024
Registration No
4363/2024
Registration Date
11-12-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEESA
Judge
12-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
045
Police Station
DEESA SOUTH POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRADHANJI VELAJI THAKOR Advocate - R G DAVE
Hearing History
Judge: 12-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case No. C.C.No. 4363/2024 The court acquitted the accused (Pradhan Velaji Hadkar) of charges under the Gujarat Sugar Prohibition Act, Section 12(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged sugar smuggling offense. The prosecution's case relied primarily on police witness testimony without corroborating independent evidence, and the court found critical gaps in the investigation, including lack of proper documentation and chain of custody procedures, rendering the charges unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. C.C.No. 4363/2024 The court acquitted the accused (Pradhan Velaji Hadkar) of charges under the Gujarat Sugar Prohibition Act, Section 12(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged sugar smuggling offense. The prosecution's case relied primarily on police witness testimony without corroborating independent evidence, and the court found critical gaps in the investigation, including lack of proper documentation and chain of custody procedures, rendering the charges unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts