PARATIKBHAI R. DARJI MAS FAINNACE SERVICE LTD. vs CHHAGANBHAI KESHAJI PADHIYAR Advocate - K K PANCHIWALA — 4443/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK040060922025

Filing Number

4443/2025

Filing Date

30-Oct-2025

Registration No

4443/2025

Registration Date

30-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEESA

Judge

16-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARATIKBHAI R. DARJI MAS FAINNACE SERVICE LTD.

    Adv. K D PADHIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHHAGANBHAI KESHAJI PADHIYAR Advocate - K K PANCHIWALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the criminal case against the accused for insufficient evidence under Section 8 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The Sessions Court directed that the accused be acquitted, finding the prosecution's case against him unproven before the lower court, and ordered the judgment be made public. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 08-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4443/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the criminal case against the accused for insufficient evidence under Section 8 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The Sessions Court directed that the accused be acquitted, finding the prosecution's case against him unproven before the lower court, and ordered the judgment be made public. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case