SHRI RAM FAINANCE LTD DEESA MAHESHBHAI KESHABHAI SAMECHA vs VINODBHAI ISHVARBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - P D PATEL — 4442/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK040060912025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4442/2025
Filing Date
30-10-2025
Registration No
4442/2025
Registration Date
30-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEESA
Judge
16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI RAM FAINANCE LTD DEESA MAHESHBHAI KESHABHAI SAMECHA
Adv. B J JOSHI
Respondent(s)
VINODBHAI ISHVARBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - P D PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the petitioner's request to proceed with proceedings under Section 18 of the relevant act, holding that there was no valid ground to maintain the case. The court ordered dismissal of the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish requisite conditions for continuation of the case and directed the same be discharged accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the petitioner's request to proceed with proceedings under Section 18 of the relevant act, holding that there was no valid ground to maintain the case. The court ordered dismissal of the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish requisite conditions for continuation of the case and directed the same be discharged accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts