SHRI RAM FAINANCE LTD DEESA MAHESHBHAI KESHABHAI SAMECHA vs VINODBHAI ISHVARBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - P D PATEL — 4442/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK040060912025

Filing Number

4442/2025

Filing Date

30-Oct-2025

Registration No

4442/2025

Registration Date

30-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEESA

Judge

16-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI RAM FAINANCE LTD DEESA MAHESHBHAI KESHABHAI SAMECHA

    Adv. B J JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINODBHAI ISHVARBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - P D PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the petitioner's request to proceed with proceedings under Section 18 of the relevant act, holding that there was no valid ground to maintain the case. The court ordered dismissal of the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish requisite conditions for continuation of the case and directed the same be discharged accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4442/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the petitioner's request to proceed with proceedings under Section 18 of the relevant act, holding that there was no valid ground to maintain the case. The court ordered dismissal of the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to establish requisite conditions for continuation of the case and directed the same be discharged accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case