NIMESHKUMAR DANAJI SANKHALA BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK DEESA BRANCH vs KOLI HIRUBEN VASAJI — 237/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 08th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBK040058842024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

237/2024

Filing Date

28-11-2024

Registration No

237/2024

Registration Date

28-11-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEESA

Judge

16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 26,

Petitioner(s)

NIMESHKUMAR DANAJI SANKHALA BARODA GUJARAT GRAMIN BANK DEESA BRANCH

Adv. H D TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

KOLI HIRUBEN VASAJI

KOLI GEMRAJI VASAJI

KOLI DASHRATHJI VASAJI

KOLI MAFTAJI VASAJI

KOLI RANAJI VASAJI

KOLI KARSHANJI VASAJI

Hearing History

Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

08-04-2026

Disposed

03-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

27-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

10-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

02-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Additional Senior Civil Judge at Deesa held Gujarat Gramin Bank entitled to recover Rs. 1,46,966/- from six agricultural loan defaulters who availed funds under the Kisan Credit Card Scheme in 2021 but failed to repay despite reminders. The court accepted the bank's documentary evidence showing the loan agreement, hypothecation of defendants' agricultural land, and account statements, while imposing 6% statutory interest per annum instead of penal rates, considering the defendants' agriculturist status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Senior Civil Judge at Deesa held Gujarat Gramin Bank entitled to recover Rs. 1,46,966/- from six agricultural loan defaulters who availed funds under the Kisan Credit Card Scheme in 2021 but failed to repay despite reminders. The court accepted the bank's documentary evidence showing the loan agreement, hypothecation of defendants' agricultural land, and account statements, while imposing 6% statutory interest per annum instead of penal rates, considering the defendants' agriculturist status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEESA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case