Government of Gujarat vs SOHANSING PRABHATSING Advocate - N S MAJIRANA — 3312/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 384,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK040047732024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3312/2024
Filing Date
04-09-2024
Registration No
3312/2024
Registration Date
04-09-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEESA
Judge
12-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
707
Police Station
DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SOHANSING PRABHATSING Advocate - N S MAJIRANA
Hearing History
Judge: 12-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 29-01-2026 | PLEA | |
| 30-12-2025 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Dispur Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Sohansinh Prabhatsih Solanki) of charges under IPC Section 384 and Gujarat Money Lenders Act Sections 42(a), 42(d), and 40. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had caused mental distress to the complainant through extortion or interest harassment, as the complainant's own witness testimony contradicted the extortion allegations and confirmed voluntary loan transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Dispur Magistrate Court acquitted the accused (Sohansinh Prabhatsih Solanki) of charges under IPC Section 384 and Gujarat Money Lenders Act Sections 42(a), 42(d), and 40. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had caused mental distress to the complainant through extortion or interest harassment, as the complainant's own witness testimony contradicted the extortion allegations and confirmed voluntary loan transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts