Government of Gujarat vs TINAJI MADARJI THAKOR Advocate - K K PANCHIWALA — 3550/2022

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK040046502022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3550/2022

Filing Date

30-12-2022

Registration No

3550/2022

Registration Date

30-12-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEESA

Judge

4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

0616

Police Station

DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PREVENTION OF GAMBLING ACT, 1887 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

TINAJI MADARJI THAKOR Advocate - K K PANCHIWALA

KANJI @ HAKO CHANDUJI THAKOR

Adv. K K PANCHIWALA

BABARJI CHMANJI THAKOR

Adv. K K PANCHIWALA

VAKHATSINH @ TINAJI LALAJI THAKOR

Adv. R G DESAI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

PLEA

27-02-2026

PLEA

13-12-2025

PLEA

01-11-2025

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act after they voluntarily confessed to the offense and pleaded guilty. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 200 (or seven days simple imprisonment in default) under Section 12 of the Prohibition Act, with the accused given a lenient sentence in consideration of their guilty plea and cooperation with the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 12 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act after they voluntarily confessed to the offense and pleaded guilty. The court sentenced each accused to a fine of Rs. 200 (or seven days simple imprisonment in default) under Section 12 of the Prohibition Act, with the accused given a lenient sentence in consideration of their guilty plea and cooperation with the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEESA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case