MAHESHBHAI KESHABHAI SAMECHA SHRI RAM FAINANCE LTD DEESA vs SHANTIBHAI DEVSIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A N PUNADIYA — 2192/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK040032422025
Filing Number
2192/2025
Filing Date
28-May-2025
Registration No
2192/2025
Registration Date
28-May-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEESA
Judge
16-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESHBHAI KESHABHAI SAMECHA SHRI RAM FAINANCE LTD DEESA
Adv. B J JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHANTIBHAI DEVSIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - A N PUNADIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petition challenging the competency of a subordinate court case, holding that Section 22 of the relevant Act does not permit filing such challenges in the manner sought. The court ruled that the petitioner must pursue the proper remedy through statutory channels rather than through this collateral proceeding, and directed that the original case continue accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
06-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2192/2025
The court dismissed the petition challenging the competency of a subordinate court case, holding that Section 22 of the relevant Act does not permit filing such challenges in the manner sought. The court ruled that the petitioner must pursue the proper remedy through statutory channels rather than through this collateral proceeding, and directed that the original case continue accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts