LATE DAHYABHAI MAGANBHAI GHANCHI (MAHESURIYA) NA HEIRS PREMILABEN D./O. DAHYABHAI MAGANLAL GHANCHI vs LATE DAHYABHAI MAGANLAL GHANCHI (MAHESURIYA) NA HEIRS — 45/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,35,37,38. Status: Defendant Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Defendant Evidence Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBK040013722023

Filing Number

45/2023

Filing Date

17-Mar-2023

Registration No

45/2023

Registration Date

17-Mar-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEESA

Judge

12-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,35,37,38
Code of Civil Procedure Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LATE DAHYABHAI MAGANBHAI GHANCHI (MAHESURIYA) NA HEIRS PREMILABEN D./O. DAHYABHAI MAGANLAL GHANCHI

    Adv. V B THAKOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LATE DAHYABHAI MAGANLAL GHANCHI (MAHESURIYA) NA HEIRS

  2. 2.VINABEN NILESHKUMAR KANUDAVALA

    Adv. D P DAVE

  3. 3.PRIYANKABEN PINKESHBHAI KANUDAVALA

    Adv. D P DAVE

  4. 4.NARESHKUMAR JIVANLAL POPATIYA

    Adv. D P DAVE

  5. 5.KAMLESHKUMAR VASANTBHAI POPATIYA

    Adv. D P DAVE

  6. 6.LATE DAHYABHAI MAGANLAL GHANCHI NA HEIRS LATE GITABEN D./O. GITABEN DAHYABHAI GHANCHI(Legal Heir)

    Adv. H D KACHCHHVA

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 07-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 05-Jul-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 11-Jun-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  12. 06-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  13. 05-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  14. 15-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  15. 01-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  16. 01-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  17. 04-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  18. 30-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  19. 19-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  20. 21-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  21. 17-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  22. 20-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  23. 18-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  24. 12-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  25. 15-Mar-2024

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 45/2023 | Deesa Civil Court | Order dated 15/03/2024 The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from alienating ancestral property, claiming she was a legal heir wrongly excluded from a 2005 mutation entry and that defendants illegally sold the property in 2022. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish the three essential conditions for interim injunction: (1) no prima facie case, as the dispute regarding joint ownership is a matter of trial; (2) no irreparable injury, since defendants hold registered sale deeds and monetary compensation is available; and (3) balance of convenience favors defendants. Cost awarded against plaintiff in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  26. 15-Mar-2024

    Issues

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  27. 01-Mar-2024

    Order On Injuction Application

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  28. 03-Feb-2024

    Order On Injuction Application

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  29. 18-Jan-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  30. 08-Jan-2024

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  31. 18-Dec-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  32. 02-Dec-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  33. 03-Nov-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  34. 10-Oct-2023

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  35. 06-Sep-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  36. 09-Aug-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  37. 10-Jul-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  38. 08-Jun-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  39. 02-May-2023

    Summons - Notice

    4Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  40. 13-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 17-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Regular Civil Suit No. 45/2023 | Deesa Civil Court | Order dated 15/03/2024 The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from alienating ancestral property, claiming she was a legal heir wrongly excluded from a 2005 mutation entry and that defendants illegally sold the property in 2022. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish the three essential conditions for interim injunction: (1) no prima facie case, as the dispute regarding joint ownership is a matter of trial; (2) no irreparable injury, since defendants hold registered sale deeds and monetary compensation is available; and (3) balance of convenience favors defendants. Cost awarded against plaintiff in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case