SHRI RAM FAINNACE LTD DEESA vs PRAKASH AMARAT KUMBHAR — 32/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJBK040004462026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
32/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEESA
Judge
16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI RAM FAINNACE LTD DEESA
Adv. B J JOSHI
Respondent(s)
PRAKASH AMARAT KUMBHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court admitted the cheque dishonor complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and issued process against the accused, finding prima facie evidence of dishonored cheque, statutory notice non-compliance, and territorial jurisdiction based on the bank account location within court jurisdiction. The court held that the special procedure under NI Act Section 142 applies, not general BNSS provisions, and therefore no pre-cognizance notice to the accused was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court admitted the cheque dishonor complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and issued process against the accused, finding prima facie evidence of dishonored cheque, statutory notice non-compliance, and territorial jurisdiction based on the bank account location within court jurisdiction. The court held that the special procedure under NI Act Section 142 applies, not general BNSS provisions, and therefore no pre-cognizance notice to the accused was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts