NIMESHKUMAR DANAJI SANKHALA BRANCH MANAGER SHRI BARODA GUJRAT GARAMIN BANK DEESA vs MAGANBHAI NATHUBHAI RABARI @ KHATANA — 13/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 08th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK040003842025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13/2025
Filing Date
16-01-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
16-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEESA
Judge
16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIMESHKUMAR DANAJI SANKHALA BRANCH MANAGER SHRI BARODA GUJRAT GARAMIN BANK DEESA
Adv. H D TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
MAGANBHAI NATHUBHAI RABARI @ KHATANA
BABUBHAI NATHUBHAI RABARI @ KHATANA
LEBABHAI NATHUBHAI RABARI @ KHATANA
MAGANBHAI MADHABHAI RABARI
RAMESHBHAI SEDHABHAI RABARI @ KHATANA
Hearing History
Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 03-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 27-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 02-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Senior Civil Judge at Deesa, Gujarat, ordered the defendants to repay Rs. 8,69,786.70 to Gujarat Gramin Bank with 6% annual interest from the date of suit filing. The court found that the defendants had obtained a Kisan Credit Card loan of Rs. 7,98,000 in 2021, mortgaged their agricultural land as security, and failed to repay the amount as stipulated in the loan agreement. The defendants were also ordered to bear all court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Senior Civil Judge at Deesa, Gujarat, ordered the defendants to repay Rs. 8,69,786.70 to Gujarat Gramin Bank with 6% annual interest from the date of suit filing. The court found that the defendants had obtained a Kisan Credit Card loan of Rs. 7,98,000 in 2021, mortgaged their agricultural land as security, and failed to repay the amount as stipulated in the loan agreement. The defendants were also ordered to bear all court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts