MAHESH KESHA SAMECHA SHRI RAM FAINNACE DEESA vs SHANTIBHAI NAGAJI PADHIYAR Advocate - M D THAKKAR — 174/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK040002232025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
174/2025
Filing Date
08-01-2025
Registration No
174/2025
Registration Date
08-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEESA
Judge
16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESH KESHA SAMECHA SHRI RAM FAINNACE DEESA
Adv. B J JOSHI
Respondent(s)
SHANTIBHAI NAGAJI PADHIYAR Advocate - M D THAKKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 16-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petitioner's request to proceed with the case further, holding that under Section 17 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the case did not meet the required conditions to continue. The court ordered that fees be paid and the case be filed in the proper court, with the decision announced in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petitioner's request to proceed with the case further, holding that under Section 17 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the case did not meet the required conditions to continue. The court ordered that fees be paid and the case be filed in the proper court, with the decision announced in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts