Government of Gujarat vs DILIPBHAI ISHVARBHAI CHAUHAN — 1755/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK030020482025

e-Filing Number

04-12-2025

Filing Number

1755/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

1755/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195055250531

Police Station

VADGAM POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILIPBHAI ISHVARBHAI CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted defendant Dilipbhai Ishvarbhai Chauhan under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying precedent that allows lenient sentencing for first-time offenders, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with two days simple imprisonment in default, rather than imposing maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1755/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted defendant Dilipbhai Ishvarbhai Chauhan under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) after he voluntarily confessed to the charges. Applying precedent that allows lenient sentencing for first-time offenders, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 with two days simple imprisonment in default, rather than imposing maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case