Government of Gujarat vs LALABHAI LAVJIBHAI KANKODIYA Advocate - L D JADAV — 1726/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030020182025
e-Filing Number
09-12-2025
Filing Number
1726/2025
Filing Date
20-Dec-2025
Registration No
1726/2025
Registration Date
20-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250473
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.LALABHAI LAVJIBHAI KANKODIYA Advocate - L D JADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Lalabhai Lavjibhai Kankodia of charges under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, and reliance on police testimony alone was insufficient to establish the alleged illegal possession and sale of liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1726/2025
Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted the accused Lalabhai Lavjibhai Kankodia of charges under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, and reliance on police testimony alone was insufficient to establish the alleged illegal possession and sale of liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts