Government of Gujarat vs MALTIBEN W/O LALJIBHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - A A JAGRALA — 1684/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK030019712025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-11-2025

Filing Number

1684/2025

Filing Date

12-12-2025

Registration No

1684/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195009250433

Police Station

CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MALTIBEN W/O LALJIBHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - A A JAGRALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

07-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Malti (wife/widow of Laljibhai) under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case regarding alleged illicit liquor possession, and relied excessively on police testimony without sufficient corroborating evidence. The accused was acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Malti (wife/widow of Laljibhai) under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case regarding alleged illicit liquor possession, and relied excessively on police testimony without sufficient corroborating evidence. The accused was acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VADGAM All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case