Government of Gujarat vs BABIBEN W/O SAMPATBHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - A A JAGRALA — 1683/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK030019702025
e-Filing Number
14-11-2025
Filing Number
1683/2025
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
1683/2025
Registration Date
12-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADGAM
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195009250459
Police Station
CHHAPI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BABIBEN W/O SAMPATBHAI DEVIPUJAK Advocate - A A JAGRALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Babieben Sampat Bhai (alleged illegal liquor possession case under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that independent panch witnesses failed to corroborate the prosecution's case, and reliance solely on police testimony without independent corroboration does not meet the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1683/2025
Court Decision Summary The Vadgam Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Babieben Sampat Bhai (alleged illegal liquor possession case under Gujarat Prohibition Act, Section 65) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that independent panch witnesses failed to corroborate the prosecution's case, and reliance solely on police testimony without independent corroboration does not meet the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts